<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ch..Ch..Ch.. Changes</title>
	<link>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2007/08/22/chchch-changes/</link>
	<description>Operators of, and bidders for, local DAB Digital Radio multiplexes.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2007/08/22/chchch-changes/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2007/08/22/chchch-changes/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>it raises an interesting question regarding the licensing rules I guess.

I'm not sure what the alternative would be though.

Certainly I don't see that it was fair to change the TX configs, or why bother with an application closing date?

As for UCB... maybe the rules should state that if a service becomes unavailable, then its that particular applicants problem - and a replacement service should not be permitted in the bid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it raises an interesting question regarding the licensing rules I guess.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the alternative would be though.</p>
<p>Certainly I don&#8217;t see that it was fair to change the TX configs, or why bother with an application closing date?</p>
<p>As for UCB&#8230; maybe the rules should state that if a service becomes unavailable, then its that particular applicants problem - and a replacement service should not be permitted in the bid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
